Tennis.  Roger Federer’s retirement: “This love for the game that has never abandoned him”

Tennis. Roger Federer’s retirement: “This love for the game that has never abandoned him”

Tennis.  Roger Federer’s retirement: “This love for the game that has never abandoned him”

Why were you interested in Roger Federer?

I have been involved in tennis for about 30 years. I started with Pete Sampras and André Agassi, James Courier or even Michael Chang. When they finished their career, I told myself that I had had the best time in tennis and it would never be the same. I was wrong ! A new generation was emerging, particularly with Roger. I discovered a friendly and always approachable person face to face when he became an icon. I wanted to understand the phenomenon and I have no regrets for not following this incredible epic to the end.

What impressed you the most about this player? How is it so different from the others, the Nadals or Djokovic?

It is simple and sophisticated at the same time. Federer has an emotional intelligence that is often not the first quality of great athletes. He adapts remarkably to all situations and has been able to evolve throughout his career. There is a gap between the young Federer and the one in the lead. It is awesome! In fact, I believe Federer has made his entire career playing against his nature. He became Zen in the field while in the early days, and even in his life, he was not. In fact, he is a fluid guy, both in the way he moves on the pitch and in the way of being.

What is surprising with Federer is that he did not immediately explode at the highest level. His apprenticeship was long.

At first, in fact, he was not at all sure that he would become the number one in the world. Many doubts remained about him. Many observers have imagined him becoming one of the top 20 or top 10. Not number one. He had a lot of trouble managing his emotions. A handicap to go higher. Five years have passed between the title among the juniors at Wimbledon and the title on the lawn of the midfield among the big names.

What finally made it happen?

He worked a lot on his mind, but I think there is one essential thing in his evolution, it is the death, in 2002, of his first coach, Australian Peter Carter, who was like his second father. This death averted her by finally maximizing all the talents we saw in him. Without Peter Carter’s death, I’m not sure Roger would have become the great champion he is. This misfortune was the emotional engine he lacked.

Does having a player like Rafael Nadal on the way also explain Roger Federer’s record and longevity?

The rivalry with Nadal gave him an extra soul. He was the undisputed king of the ATP classification for five / six years, but the presence of the Spaniard, both on clay and hard, forced him not to give up and to continue. Yet, in addition to this, there is also this love for the game that has never abandoned him.

That’s right, let’s finish with the game. What brought Roger Federer to tennis in the 21st century aside from his multiple titles?

He brought with us what we call the “plus one”, that is, the second blow. Where the players had their own path, i.e. volley serves or baseline shots, Roger, with the right of him, was able to maximize attacks in the second phase. Namely: a serve, a return and then a winning attack most of the time.

“It’s a bittersweet decision because I will miss everything the circuit has given me. But, at the same time, there are so many things to celebrate”, underlined the former No. Grand Slam titles overtaken by Rafael Nadal (22) then Novak Djokovic (21). Roger Federer, who notably has eight Wimbledon trophies to his name, considers himself “one of the luckiest people on Earth” in his social media post. “He I was gifted with a talent for playing tennis and I took it to a level I could never have imagined and for much longer than I thought possible,” he explained. .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.